MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2937787567 · doi:10.1139/cjes-2018-0307

A mid-Cretaceous alkaline volcano in the Davis Strait

2019· article· en· W2937787567 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Christian Knudsen, Ulrik Gregersen, Thomas F. Kokfelt, Mette Olivarius, Tonny B. Thomsen

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNationale Geologiske Undersøgelser for Danmark og Grønland
KeywordsGeologyZirconBasaltGeochemistryVolcanoVolcanic rockAndesite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The AT2-1 well in the Davis Strait between Canada and Greenland penetrated an approximately 1.2 km thick sequence of alkaline volcanic rocks with some intercalated sediments at depths between 3690 to 4850 m. These volcanic rocks can be mapped on 2D seismic data and constitute a cone-shaped 5 km × 10 km wide and >1.2 km high structural high named the Atammik Volcano. This sequence comprises two distinct parts, an upper part of phono-tephrite to basaltic trachy-andesite and a lower part of tephriphonolite and phonolite. Rock textures and structures testify to a volcanic origin, with the uppermost units showing textural evidence of being subaerially extruded. Zircon crystals found in a sample of phonolite from 4453 m were dated by in situ laser ablation ICP–MS technique to yield ages between 98 and 93 Ma, indicating a maximum age of the formation of the phonolitic volcano of 93 Ma (Turonian). Further, detrital zircons from the clastic material have been dated yielding Archean ages. The gamma ray log indicates three internal cycles within the phonolites, each cycle displaying a stratigraphically upwards decrease in potassium content, suggesting the existence of a longer-lived system undergoing repeated magmatic differentiation and eruption events. The upper volcanic sequence is less evolved and less alkaline than the lower, suggesting a change in primary magma compositions towards progressively higher degrees of melting of the underlying mantle. This fits into a scheme of progressively higher degrees of melting with time, which in a regional context probably corresponds to a rifting event.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score0.830

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences→Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→