MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2937789608 · doi:10.1002/essoar.10500487.1

Chemistry-Climate Links for Carbon Monoxide in Northern Hemisphere Boreal Fire Regions and an Assessment of Global Fire Inventories

2019· article· en· W2937789608 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rebecca R. Buchholz, H. M. Worden, Dorit Hammerling, Benjamin Gaubert, L. K. Emmons, Christine Wiedinmyer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceClimatologyNorthern HemisphereBorealArctic oscillationTrace gasAtmospheric sciencesArcticEmission inventoryTaigaTroposphereAtmosphere (unit)Climate changeAir quality indexMeteorologyGeographyOceanographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fire emissions are a major contributor to atmospheric composition, affecting atmospheric oxidizing capacity and air quality. Transported amounts from Northern Hemisphere boreal fires can reach the pristine Arctic atmosphere as well as impact air quality in populated regions. Carbon monoxide (CO) is a useful trace gas emitted from fires that can be used to link extreme fire events with climate variability. We use our recently developed statistical tool to investigate the climate drivers of satellite measured CO variability in two Northern Hemisphere boreal fire regions: northwest Canada and Siberia. Our focus is on quantifying the ability of climate mode indices for the Pacific, Atlantic, Indian and Arctic Oceans in predicting CO amounts in these regions. Climate mode indices El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO), Tropical North Atlantic (TNA), the Dipole Mode Index (DMI) and the Arctic Oscillation (AO) are used to develop statistical models of column CO interannual variability from the Measurements of Pollution In The Troposphere (MOPITT) satellite instrument, for the time period covering 2001-2017. In addition, we assess the ability of fire emission inventories to reproduce CO, including the Fire Inventory from NCAR (FINN), the NASA Quick Fire Emissions Dataset (QFED) and the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) Global Fire Assimilation System (GFAS). These are implemented in the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model with chemistry (CAM-chem) and subsequently evaluated against MOPITT CO observations. Emission uncertainty contribution to inter-inventory differences are quantified, and the modeled contribution of fires to CO interannual variability is determined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score0.378

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics→French-language works237,207→