Bibliographic record
Abstract
Frequent pattern mining is an important research areas in data mining. Since its introduction, it has drawn attention of many researchers. Consequently, many algorithms have been proposed. Popular algorithms include level-wise Apriori based algorithms, tree based algorithms, and hyperlinked array structure based algorithms. While these algorithms are popular and beneficial due to some nice properties, they also suffer from some drawbacks such as multiple database scans, recursive tree constructions, or multiple hyperlink adjustments. In the current era of big data, high volumes of a wide variety of valuable data of different veracities can be easily collected or generated at high velocity in various real-life applications. Among these 5V's of big data, I focus on handling high volumes of big data in my Ph.D. thesis. Specifically, I design and implement a new efficient frequent pattern mining algorithmic technique called B-mine, which overcomes some of the aforementioned drawbacks and achieves better performance when compared with existing algorithms. I also extend my B-mine algorithm into a family of algorithms that can perform big data mining efficiently. Moreover, I design four different frameworks that apply this family of algorithms to the real-life application of social network mining. Evaluation results show the efficiency and practicality of all these algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".