MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2937866155 · doi:10.7202/1058164ar

Analyse sociohistorique et épistémologique de la recherche en responsabilité sociale des entreprises

2019· article· fr· W2937866155 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Sofiane Baba

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement international · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La responsabilité sociale des entreprises (RSE) est un sujet de société en vogue qui suscite de nombreux débats tant chez les universitaires que les praticiens. La présente étude propose une analyse sociohistorique et épistémologique de la RSE afin d’en cerner la construction et de reconstituer une partie de sa généalogie. Notre étude soulève deux contributions principales. La première explicite trois tendances qui ont marqué l’évolution de la production de connaissances en RSE. La seconde contribution suggère que le projet épistémologique qu’incarne la théorisation de la RSE est en constante évolution à l’image du champ plus large des théories des organisations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.997
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.011
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManagement internationalSame topicCorporate Social Responsibility ReportingFrench-language works237,207