MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2937901751 · doi:10.4000/books.purh.3557

Paulo Freire et la pensée critique en éducation : contribution à une histoire des idées critiques au sein du Forum mondial de l’éducation

2015· book-chapter· fr· W2937901751 on OpenAlexaff
Oussama Naouar

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Rouen et du Havre eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCritical and Liberation Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IntroductionSous bien des aspects, la pensée de Paulo Freire relève de la recherche profonde d’une alternative à l’éducation telle qu’elle est, dans ses considérations politiques, éthiques et esthétiques. Aussi, ce pédagogue est-il qualifié de penseur critique, par les valeurs et les aspirations qui traversent l’ensemble de son œuvre. Les acteurs de l’éducation au Brésil, dans cette volonté de construire une pensée critique en éducation, se réfèrent continuellement à Paulo Freire. Quelle est...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0130.036
Scholarly communication0.0080.008
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires de Rouen et du Havre eBooksSame topicCritical and Liberation PedagogyFrench-language works237,207