Harvesting Mechanical Work From Folding-Based Protein Engines: From Single-Molecule Mechanochemical Cycles to Macroscopic Devices
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mechanochemical coupling cycles underlie the work-generation mechanisms of biological systems and are realized by highly regulated conformational changes of the protein machineries. However, it has been challenging to utilize protein conformational changes to do mechanical work at the macroscopic level in biomaterials, and it remains elusive to construct macroscopic mechanochemical devices based on molecular-level mechanochemical coupling systems. Here, the authors demonstrate that protein folding can be utilized to realize protein’s mechanochemical cycles at both single-molecule and macroscopic levels. Our results demonstrate, for the first time, the successful harnessing of mechanical work generated by protein folding in a macroscopic protein hydrogel device, and the work generated by protein folding compares favorably with the energy output of molecular motors. Our work bridges a gap between single-molecule and macroscopic levels, and paves the way to utilizing proteins as building blocks to design protein-based artificial muscles and soft actuators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it