Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article analyse le dispositif français d’intégration républicaine et souligne le potentiel des apports d’une approche interculturelle pour accompagner et informer la réflexion en cours autour de la réforme de la politique publique d’intégration. Les entreprises forment leurs cadres expatriés pour réduire le choc culturel, alors que des dizaines de milliers d’autres migrants, souvent en marge de la société, ne bénéficient pas d’actions semblables de sensibilisation culturelle. À la lumière du rapport Taché sur l’intégration des migrants (février 2018), différents paradigmes – fondés sur les valeurs, socioconstructionnistes, critiques – sont exposés pour éclairer les logiques actuelles du dispositif républicain et les dynamiques sociales associées. À partir d’une étude locale des acteurs institutionnels et associatifs de l’accueil des migrants dans l’agglomération dijonnaise, l’article propose des pistes pour développer des actions de sensibilisation culturelle pour les différents acteurs concernés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".