Effects of Goal Management Training According to Bilateral Activities of Autism Spectrum Disorders: Pilot Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
목적: 본 연구는 정상 발달아동과 자폐스펙트럼으로 진단 받은 아동에게 목표관리 훈련을 실시하여 그 효과를 비교하였다. 방법: 연구대상자는 정상 발달아동 4명과 자폐스펙트럼으로 진단 받은 아동 4명을 대상으로 실시하였으며, 모든 대상자 에게 동일한 목표관리 훈련을 제공하였다. 아동 및 보호자가 원하는 목표활동을 선정하여 3가지 활동에 모두 목표 관리 훈련을 실시하였다. 중재기간은 총 10회로 주 2회씩 5주 동안 진행되었으며, 두 그룹의 총 8명의 대상자에게 연구자가 1:1로 각 대상자에게 40분씩 목표 관리 훈련을 실시하였다. 통계방법으로는 기술통계와 빈도분석을 사용하였으며, 두 그룹의 차이를 비교하기 위해 비모수 통계분석인 Mann-Whitney 검정을 실시하였다. 통계학적 유의수준은 0.05로 설정하였다. 결과: 목표관리 훈련은 두 그룹에서 COPM의 수행도에서는 통계학적으로 유의하게 차이가 없었다(p>.05). 목표 관리 훈련은 운동기능을 평가하는 BOT-2의 총점에서 자페스펙트럼 장애 그룹과 정상아동 그룹 간에 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있었다(p<.05). 또한 시지각 기능을 평가하는 DTVP에서도 양측 활동을 하는 눈손협응 하위검사에서 자폐스펙트럼 아동과 정상아동 그룹간에 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있었다 (p<.05). 결론: 본 연구는 정상아동과 비교하여 자페스펙트럼 아동에게 목표관리 훈련을 적용가능성을 확인하였으며, 그 효과성도 확인하였다.The study has compared normally developed children and children who were diagnosed as autism spectrum in goal management training them to observe the effect. The research was conducted to four normally developed children and four children who were diagnosed as autism spectrum, and all subjects were provided with identical goal management training. The children and the caregivers have selected desired objectives activity, and all three activities were followed by goal management training. Intervention periods were conducted ten times in total, two times a week for five weeks, and eight subjects in the two groups were trained one on one by the researcher. The training time was 40 minutes for every session. The descriptive statistics and frequency analysis were used as the statistical method, and the Mann-Whitney test, the nonparametric statistical analysis, was conducted to compare the difference between the two groups. Goal management training for two groups did not show a statistically significant difference in terms of the performance status of Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (p>.05). In the summary of Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (2nd) which evaluates the motor skill, there was a statistically significant difference between the autism spectrum disorder group and normal group (p<.05). Additionally, the two groups showed a statistically significant difference in eye-hand coordination sub-test among Developmental Test of Visual Perception (2nd) which evaluates the visual perception performance (p<.05). The research has confirmed the applicability of goal management training to children with autism spectrum compared to the normally developed children, and it has confirmed the effectiveness of the training.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".