The Application of Fiber Quality Analysis (FQA) and Cellulose Accessibility Measurements To Better Elucidate the Impact of Fiber Curls and Kinks on the Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Fibers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fiber curls, kinks, microcompressions, nodes, crimps, and dislocations have been frequently associated with weak points in biomass fibers that exhibit increased accessibility to enzymes and chemicals. Rapid measurements using fiber quality analysis (FQA) showed that the curl and kink indices were increased by 300% in fibers that were processed at high solids loadings, but these indices were readily reversed by the application of a “straightening” treatment to the fibers. The curlation of fibers increased their susceptibility to shortening when they were exposed to endoglucanases and hydrochloric acid. Increased fiber curl also enhanced cellulose accessibility as measured by Simons staining (SS) and water retention value (WRV) and resulted in the formation of fiber networks with increased bulk. Upon straightening the fibers, these effects were reversed, with the exception of the increases in cellulose accessibility measured by SS and WRV. The induction of fiber curls and kinks also resulted in irreversible increases in cellulose hydrolysis yields of up to 17% that were more pronounced at higher solids loadings. The better hydrolysis at higher solids loadings was likely due to the well-known tendency of curled fibers to form bulkier fiber networks with decreased fiber bonding. The results suggest that it should be possible to simultaneously increase cellulose accessibility when hydrolysis is performed at high solids loadings by the application of appropriate physical treatments. It was apparent that the increased cellulose accessibility measured by SS and WRV and reflected by the enhancement in enzymatic hydrolysis yields was a byproduct of curl and kink induction and thus was not directly measurable using an FQA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".