Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se presentan resultados de una investigación con estudiantes de educación superior, ideas respecto de su propia familia y la relación que ésta ha tenido con las escuelas a las que aquéllos han asistido. Existen múltiples trabajos acerca de la relación escuelas-familias en la educación básica, pero no en educación superior. Si se considera estos dos ámbitos como los principales responsables de la socialización primaria, la aparente distancia que van tomando los estudiantes respecto de sus familias conforme se avanza en los niveles educativos, sólo se esperaría en términos de un desarrollo de la autonomía durante la juventud. Los resultados obtenidos reflejan un “arropamiento” familiar importante y constante durante toda su trayectoria; además, se muestran respuestas de estudiantes universitarios y de tres Escuelas Normales, todos en Aguascalientes. En la mayoría de los casos pareciera que prevalecen familias tradicionales y estables que pueden ofrecer buenas condiciones para los estudios
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".