MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2938157671 · doi:10.5539/jas.v11n5p114

Calculation of the Thermal Properties (and Their Uncertainties) of Strawberry During Its Cooling Under Natural Convection

2019· article· en· W2938157671 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
W. P. Silva, Josivanda Palmeira Gomes, Newton Carlos Santos, Alexandre José de Melo Queiroz, R. M. F. de Figuiredo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGreenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsThermal diffusivityThermal conductionCovarianceThermalHeat transfer coefficientThermodynamicsHeat transferProduct (mathematics)ConvectionSpherical geometryMechanicsMaterials scienceDiffusionMathematicsPhysicsGeometryStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many times, the thermal properties of a product are determined but their uncertainties (and, mainly, the covariance matrix) are not provided. Thus, in the simulations, it is not possible to establish a confidence band for a transient state described through the values obtained for these properties. In this article, a model was proposed to determine thermal diffusivity and convective heat transfer coefficient, providing the above-mentioned lack of information, for a product with spherical geometry during its cooling. The proposed model involved: 1) an experimental data set of the cooling kinetics in a point within the product; 2) a one-dimensional numerical solution of the heat conduction equation; 3) an optimizer based on the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm to determine the thermal properties, their uncertainties, and the covariance between the parameters. Model was applied for determining thermal properties of strawberries, using an equivalent sphere to represent the geometry of the product, and the obtained results were compatible with the literature results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.674
Threshold uncertainty score0.143

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicGreenhouse Technology and Climate ControlFrench-language works237,207