MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2938183662 · doi:10.1101/609867

Mechanical constraints influence microtubule orientation in plant cells

2019· preprint· en· W2938183662 on OpenAlexaff
Sven Bachmann, Richard Froese, Eric N. Cytrynbaum

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Molecular Biology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurvaturePhysicsGeodesicPitchfork bifurcationMicrotubuleClassical mechanicsSurface (topology)Deflection (physics)BifurcationMechanicsGeometryBifurcation diagramMathematicsNonlinear systemBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT In growing plant cells, parallel ordering of microtubules (MTs) along the inner surface of the cell membrane influences the direction of cell expansion and thereby plant morphology. For correct expansion of organs that primarily grow by elongating, such as roots and stems, MTs must bend in the high-curvature direction along the cylindrically shaped cell membrane in order to form the required circumferential arrays. Previous studies, which have recapitulated the self-organization of these arrays, ignored MT mechanics and assumed MTs follow geodesics of the cell surface. Here, we show, through analysis of a derived Euler-Lagrange equation, that an elastic MT constrained to a cylindrical surface will deflect away from geodesics and toward low curvature directions to minimize bending energy. This occurs when the curvature of the cell surface is relatively high for a given anchor density. In the limit of infinite anchor density, MTs always follow geodesics. We compare our analytical predictions to measured curvatures and anchor densities and find that the regime in which cells are forming these cortical arrays straddles the region of parameter space in which arrays must form under the antagonistic influence of this mechanically induced deflection. Although this introduces a potential obstacle to forming circumferentially orientated arrays that needs to be accounted for in the models, it also raises the question of whether plants use this mechanical phenomenon to regulate array orientation. The model also constitutes an elegant generalization of the classical Euler-bucking instability along with an intrinsic unfolding of the associated pitchfork bifurcation. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The cortical microtubule array in plant cells is a dynamic structure whose organization influences cell function, growth, and plant morphology. During cell growth, the array must be highly ordered and perpendicular to the axis of expansion. In other instances, it can be disordered or axially oriented. Experimental and modelling studies have outlined the importance of various microtubule-microtubule interactions in the ordering and orienting process. We explore the influence of cell shape on the bending of microtubules that has been largely ignored to date. We find that cell shape can induce microtubule bending that steers them away from high-curvature directions. This bending force can act as an obstacle to proposed mechanisms for array organization and also as a mechanism for regulating reorientation of the array.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicPlant Molecular Biology Research→French-language works237,207→