MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W293819735

La Querelle des Bouffons: crise du goût musical et scission du royaume sous Louis XV

2011· article· fr· W293819735 on OpenAlexaff
Claude Dauphin

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les représentations de La Serva Padrona, opéra de Pergolèse, entreprises à Paris à partir d’août 1752 par la troupe italienne des Bouffons, firent éclater une crise du goût musical qui ébranla la royauté de Louis XV. À l’Opéra, les partisans de la musique française se regroupèrent sous la loge du roi et ceux de la musique italienne,sous celle de la reine. Les libelles contre la musique française et leurs réfutations, publiées dans le cadre de ce conflit du goût, totalisent plus de deux mille pages. Ils ont pour auteurs des écrivains aujourd’hui célèbres, Rousseau, Diderot, d’Alembert, Grimm, d’Holbach, le Père Castel, mais aussi d’autres sujets qui, comme eux, appartiennent aux trois ordres de la nation : peuple, noblesse et clergé. Sur l’emblème de la musique, tous veulent inscrire une allégeance identitaire apparemment italienne versus française, plus fondamentalement européenne versus versaillaise. Madame de Pompadour commande des œuvres musicales, Diderot met au concours des sujets de dissertation… Une période de créativité fascinante, fertile et menaçante qui apparaît comme une symbolique répétition générale du spectacle de la Révolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.290
GPT teacher head0.516
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207