MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2938217999 · doi:10.1101/613984

Nerve Excitability Differences in Slow and Fast Motor Axons of the Rat: more than just <i>I</i> <sub> <i>h</i> </sub>

2019· preprint· en· W2938217999 on OpenAlexafffund
James Bell, Chad Lorenz, Kelvin E. Jones

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Canadian institutionsWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of Alberta
FundersFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of AlbertaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMuscular Dystrophy CanadaUniversity of AlbertaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaALS Society of Canada
KeywordsRefractory periodHyperpolarization (physics)Motor nerveAnesthesiaChemistrySilent periodSciatic nerveAxonInternal medicineMedicineAnatomyStimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective The objective was to determine if choice of anaesthetic confounded previous conclusions about the differences in nerve excitability indices between fast and slow motor axons. Methodology Nerve excitability of the rat sciatic nerve was tested while measuring responses of motor axons innervating the slow-twitch soleus (SOL) and fast-twitch tibialis anterior (TA) muscles. The experiments were conducted with sodium pentobarbital (SP) anaesthetic and compared to previous results that used ketamine-xylazine (KX). Results and Conclusions Previous conclusions about the differences in nerve excitability indices between TA and SOL motor axons using KX were corroborated and extended when experiments were done with SP. Nerve excitability indices sensitive to changes in hyperpolarization-activated inwardly rectifying cation current ( I h ) indicated an increase in I h in SOL axons compared to TA axons ( e.g . S3 (−100 %), t=7.949 (df=10), p &lt; 0.0001; TEh (90–100 ms), t=2.659 (df=20), p = 0.0145; hyperpolarizing I/V slope, t=4.308 (df=19), p = 0.0004). SOL axons also had a longer strength-duration time constant (t=3.35 (df=20), p = 0.0032) and a longer and larger magnitude relative refractory period (RRP (ms) t=3.53 (df=12), p = 0.0041; Refractoriness at 2 ms t=0.0055 (df=9), p = 0.0055). Anaesthetic choice affected many measures of peripheral nerve excitability with differences most apparent in tests of threshold electrotonus and recovery cycle. For example, recovery cycle with KX lacked a clear superexcitable and late subexcitable period. We conclude that KX had a confounding effect on nerve excitability results consistent with ischaemic depolarization. Results using SP revealed the full extent of differences in nerve excitability measures between putative slow and fast motor axons of the rat. These differences have important implications for the use of nerve excitability measures during processes such as ageing where it is believed that there is a selective loss of fast axons. New &amp; Noteworthy Nerve excitability testing is a tool used to provide insight into the properties of ion channels in peripheral nerves. It is used clinically to assess pathophysiology of motor axons. Researchers customarily think of motor axons as homogeneous; however, we demonstrate there are clear differences between fast and slow axons in the rat. This is important for interpreting results with selective motor neuronopathy, like aging where fast axons are at high risk of degeneration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.536
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicPeripheral Neuropathies and DisordersFrench-language works237,207