MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2938346890 · doi:10.2983/035.038.0118

Estimates of Reproductive Potential and Timing in California Sea Cucumbers Parastichopus californicus (Stimpson, 1857) from Southeast Alaska Based on Natural Spawning

2019· article· en· W2938346890 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Charlotte Regula Whitefield, Sarah L. Mincks

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Shellfish Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEchinoderm biology and ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFecundityBiologyGonadSpawn (biology)Development of the gonadsFisheryPopulationZoologyEcologyAnimal scienceDemographyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate estimates of fecundity and spawn timing are essential to fisheries management but can be difficult to obtain in nonaggregating broadcast-spawning species such as the commercially harvested sea cucumber Parastichopus californicus. Individuals of P. californicus collected from Southeast Alaska (SEAK) over 3 y were examined to determine the timing of spawning based on seasonal variations in gonad indices (GI). Gonad indices measured at different time points in the annual reproductive cycle were compared with gonad lipid content and egg development to validate GI as an indicator of gonad maturation. Fecundity was estimated as the total number of eggs and as the number of viable eggs produced in both live-spawned and strip-spawned animals. Results suggest spawning may occur slightly earlier than previously reported in British Columbia, Canada, where fecundity was about two times higher than in SEAK. Seasonal changes in gonad total lipid and maturation stage were recorded. Gonad index was moderately correlated with both gonad lipid content and maturation stage. Estimates of total fecundity and viable eggs based on live spawning did not significantly differ among the 3 y sampled. Live spawning yielded comparable estimates of total fecundity and viable eggs per gram female wet weight compared with strip spawning. These findings inform aquaculture efforts and management of the commercially harvested SEAK population of P. californicus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Shellfish ResearchSame topicEchinoderm biology and ecologyFrench-language works237,207