Ambulatory Blood Pressure Trajectory and Perceived Stress in Relation to Birth Outcomes in Healthy Pregnant Adolescents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: An early decline in resting blood pressure (BP), followed by an upward climb, is well documented and indicative of a healthy pregnancy course. Although BP is considered both an effector of stress and a clinically meaningful measurement in pregnancy, little is known about its trajectory in association with birth outcomes compared with other stress effectors. The current prospective longitudinal study examined BP trajectory and perceived stress in association with birth outcomes (gestational age (GA) at birth and birth weight (BW) percentile corrected for GA) in pregnant adolescents, a group at risk for stress-associated poor birth outcomes. METHODS: Healthy pregnant nulliparous adolescents (n = 139) were followed from early pregnancy through birth. At three time points (13-16, 24-27, and 34-37 gestational weeks ±1 week), the Perceived Stress Scale was collected along with 24-hour ambulatory BP (systolic and diastolic) and electronic diary reporting of posture. GA at birth and BW were abstracted from medical records. RESULTS: After adjustment for posture and pre-pregnancy body mass index, hierarchical mixed-model linear regression showed the expected early decline (B = -0.18, p = .023) and then increase (B = 0.01, p < .001) of diastolic BP approximating a U-shape; however, systolic BP displayed only an increase (B = 0.01, p = .010). In addition, the models indicated a stronger systolic and diastolic BP U-shape for early GA at birth and lower BW percentile and an inverted U-shape for late GA at birth and higher BW percentile. No effects of perceived stress were observed. CONCLUSIONS: These results replicate the pregnancy BP trajectory from previous studies of adults and indicate that the degree to which the trajectory emerges in adolescence may be associated with variation in birth outcomes, with a moderate U-shape indicating the healthiest outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".