THE INCIDENCE AND STRUCTURE OF OPHTHALMOPATHOLOGY OF TUBALARS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
673 Tubalars have been examined during the expeditions undertaken by the Institute staff. It was 67% of all ethnic groups, compactly living in the Altai Republic. We have also examined 521 Russians and 316 Métis (children of a Russian and an Altaian). The overall incidence of ophthalmopathology (N00-59, Q12-14, D31, S05) at Tubalars amounted to 1965,82 ‰. Among Tubalars the prevalence of eye diseases has been found in females (women — 2075,54 ‰; men — 1896,88 ‰). Age affects the ophthalmopathology incidence in the population of Tubalars. The structure and the incidence of eye diseases in Tubalars has been proven: anomalies of refraction and accommodation disorders (799,40 ‰); conjunctival diseases (390,79 ‰); diseases of the retina (212,48 ‰); disease of the lens (164,93 ‰); other eye diseases and neoplasms of its ancillary apparatus (124,81 ‰); diseases of the lacrimal apparatus (112,93 ‰). Women Tubalars suffered from cataracts more frequently than men (p = 0.045). This is probably due to the higher life expectancy of women and more frequent recording of the age-related cataract in this group. Over the past 25 years the agerelated cataracts in Altaians have been registered in younger age. Age-related cataracts prevailed over other forms of cataract both in Tubalars (148.59 ‰), and Russians (307.1 ‰), Métis (44.3 ‰), and the most common stage of development of senile cataract in Tubalars (90%), Russian (93%) and Métis (93%) was an initial cataract. Retinal Diseases in Tubalars occurred mainly in patients over 30, with the indicators of higher values in the age group 50-59 years (about 456.89%) and 60-69 years (675,78 ‰). In the structure of retinal diseases in all three ethnic groups background retinopathy dominated, among which the first place was occupied by the retinopathy of hypertensive type (p = 0,000). The hypotonic type of retinopathy was less frequent — 16,34 ‰ (for Tubalars p = 0,000). In women, the retinopathy of hypertensive type was recorded 1.5 times higher than in men (p = 0,031).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".