MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2938675522 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsz067.786

0788 Sleep Characteristics Of Children With Tourette Syndrome And Explosive Outbursts

2019· article· en· W2938675522 on OpenAlexaffabout
J. Leclerc, Élyse Chevrier, Marjolaine Chicoine, Roger Godbout

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Canadian institutionsHôpital Rivière-des-PrairiesUniversité de MontréalCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-MontréalInstitut universitaire en santé mentale de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActigraphySleep (system call)Tourette syndromePsychologyIntervention (counseling)Restless legs syndromePediatricsMedicineSleep onset latencyAudiologySleep disorderPsychiatryInsomnia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tourette Syndrome (TS) is defined by motor and sound tics. Opposition and aggressive behaviors are common in children with TS, and some even experience explosive outbursts. These sudden and recurrent events are considered the worst symptoms by parents because of their severe interference with daily functioning. It is estimated that about 25% of children with TS will have sleep problems. Since inadequate sleep exacerbates behavioral symptoms of children with psychiatric disorders, we investigated whether poor sleep and explosive outbursts are association together in children with TS. Seven boys with TS (9.4±1.1 years old) and enrolled in a cognitive-behavioral program aiming at decreasing explosive outbursts were recruited. Sleep was recorded with actigraphy for 2 consecutive weeks prior to the intervention and parents filled a sleep diary during the same period as well as after the intervention. Both the mothers and the fathers filled the Children Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) before and after the intervention. Explosive outbursts were scored from 1 (less severe) to 10 (more severe). The average actigraphy data over 2 weeks for the 7 children was not atypical, including sleep latency (26.9 ± 4.0 min.), total sleep time (493.1 ± 19.5 min.) and sleep efficiency (90.8% ± 1.1%). Three out of the 7 participants experienced explosive outbursts during the actigraphy recording period, for a total of 8 events (mean severity score: 6.3 ± 0.9). There were no differences in actigraphy variables extracted from the nights preceding and those immediately following the explosive outbursts. During the pre-intervention period, mothers and fathers responded in similar ways to the CSHQ (total score 49.4 ± 2.9 vs 46.4 ± 1.7, respectively), but mothers reported more parasomnias (11.1±1.2 vs 9.6±1.3; p<0.01). All of the children exceeded the CSHQ clinical cut-off of 41. Post-intervention analyses are currently being analyzed. Children with TS display signs of sleep disorders according to CSHQ scores but not actigraphy. Explosive outbursts do not seem to be preceded nor followed by particular sleep patterns. Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesFrench-language works237,207