Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'influence de la variété de blé sur la qualité du pain de blé entier a été évaluée. L'objectif ultime était de vérifier l'effet de la composition des fibres alimentaires de quatre variétés de blé du Québec (Brio, Pollet, Barrie et Celtic) sur la qualité du pain de blé entier. Les paramètres étudiés incluaient le volume du pain et la teneur en fibres alimentaires solubles et insolubles (hémicelluloses, cellulose et lignine) des grains, des fractions de mouture (farine blanche, remoulages, son) et du pain blanc ou de blé entier. La variété de blé affectait beaucoup plus le volume du pain de blé entier que celui du pain blanc; cependant, ces différences n'étaient pas causées par la teneur en fibres alimentaires des farines de blé entier. Si le son de blé était très friable ou s'il absorbait peu d'eau, le pain de blé entier était peu volumineux. La teneur en amidon résistant et, dans une moindre mesure, en fibres insolubles de la farine augmentait à la suite de la cuisson du pain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".