What’s Happening When the Pregnancies Are Not Terminated in Case of Anencephalic Fetuses?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To review the obstetric outcomes of pregnancies with anencephalic fetuses when these pregnancies are not terminated and ongoing. METHODS: A retrospective chart review is made of the cases with a prenatal diagnosis of anencephaly and who were opted to continue the pregnancy in 1-year period. The evaluated data included gestational age at diagnosis, gestational age at birth, labor induction rates, cesarean delivery rates, stillbirth, shoulder dystocia rate, antepartum and postpartum hemorrhage. RESULTS: A total of 28 cases that were selected from 87 cases with the diagnosis of anencephaly are included in the study. The average gestational age at diagnosis was 18 weeks. The average gestational age at birth was 31 weeks (range 23 - 37 weeks). Stillbirths were reported in 32% (9/28). Polyhydramnios developed at six patients and two of them required amniodrainage due to severe polyhydramnios. Vaginal birth was achieved in 67% (19/28) of the patients. Labor induction was applied at total 17 patients and one of them had gone to cesarean section due to failed induction. There were two cases of shoulder dystocia. Nine patients had gone to cesarean delivery. Any other complication was not encountered. CONCLUSIONS: Parents should be counseled in detail about continuation of an anencephalic pregnancy before making their decision. The information about "what an anencephalic pregnancy can lead"' should be given. The redundant cesarean deliveries, polyhydramnios and associated complications, obstetrical hemorrhage risk should be discussed with patients. It should also be emphasized that these maternal risks are for the sake of a non-life expectant baby.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".