MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Effect Of Using Physical Line-Up Game On Students’ Grammar Achievement At The Eleventh Grade Of SMAN 3 Pamekasan

2018· article· en· W2938994590 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWACANA DIDAKTIKA · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Methods and Media Use
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics educationGrammarExperimental researchPopulationMathematicsPsychologyReading comprehensionLinguisticsReading (process)PhilosophyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research applied experimental design with a quantitative approach. It was quasi-experimental research type. The instrument research used test (pre-test and post-test) and documentation. The population of this research was the whole class XI students of SMAN 3 Pamekasan and the sample of this research was XI-MIPA3 as control group and XI-MIPA4 as experimental group. The control group was 30 students and either the experimental group. So, the sample of this research was 60 students. the The data collected were analyzed by using t-test formula to find whether any effect of using physical line-up game on students’ grammar achievement at the eleventh grade of SMAN 3 Pamekasan. The result of this study showed that t-value ( ) is higher than t-table ( ) either 5% or 1% where (5% = 1,67 < 3,33) or (1% = 2,39 < 3,33). But in this case, the researcher used significant on 5% (5% = 1,67 < 3,33). Thus, it can be concluded that Ha (Alternative Hypothesis) was accepted and the Ho (Null Hypothesis) was rejected. So, the effect was far in achieving the student’s ability of grammar comprehension by using physical line-up game.
 
 Abstrak: Penelitian ini menerapkan desain eksperimen dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Jenis penelitian kuasi-eksperimental. Instrumen penelitian menggunakan tes (pre-test dan post-test) dan dokumentasi. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas XI SMAN 3 Pamekasan dan sampel penelitian ini adalah XI-MIPA3 sebagai kelompok kontrol dan XI-MIPA4 sebagai kelompok. Jumlah siswa pada Kelompok kontrol dan kelompok eksperimen adalah 33 siswa. Jadi, sampel penelitian ini adalah 66 siswa. Data yang terkumpul dianalisis dengan menggunakan rumus t-test untuk mengetahui apakah ada pengaruh penggunaan physical line-up game terhadap prestasi grammar siswa pada kelas XI SMAN 3 Pamekasan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa t-nilai (t0) lebih tinggi dari t-tabel (tt) baik 5% atau 1% di mana (5% = 1,67 <3,33) atau (1 % = 2,39 <3,33). Tetapi dalam hal ini, peneliti menggunakan signifikan pada 5% (5% = 1,67 <3,33). Dengan demikian, dapat disimpulkan bahwa Ha (Hipotesis Alternatif) diterima dan Ho (Null Hypothesis) ditolak. Jadi, efeknya jauh dalam mencapai kemampuan pemahaman gramatika siswa dengan menggunakan physical line-up game.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.665
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it