MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2939019316 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2019.8682446

Novel Detection Methods for Zero-padded Single Carrier Spatial Modulation in Doubly Selective Channels

2019· article· en· W2939019316 on OpenAlexaff
Hamed Abdzadeh-Ziabari, Benoı̂t Champagne

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingle antenna interference cancellationInterference (communication)Computer scienceModulation (music)AlgorithmBit error rateChannel (broadcasting)Basis (linear algebra)Computational complexity theorySpatial modulationSIGNAL (programming language)Electronic engineeringMathematicsTelecommunicationsDecoding methodsEngineeringAcousticsMIMOPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present novel methods for signal detection in single carrier zero-padded spatial modulation under high mobility conditions. By expressing the doubly selective channel in terms of the basis expansion model (BEM), first a maximum likelihood (ML) method is presented as a processing framework. To reduce the complexity of the exhaustive ML search, two novel methods, respectively the BEM-based partial interference cancellation (BPIC) and BPIC with successive interference cancellation (BPIC-SIC), are then proposed. The complexity of the new methods are compared and their performance is evaluated by simulations in terms of bit error rate. The results indicate that the new schemes can remarkably improve the performance compared with the conventional methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207