MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2939197469 · doi:10.5802/jtnb.1051

Newton–Okounkov bodies: an approach of function field arithmetic

2019· article· en· W2939197469 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Huayi Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal de Théorie des Nombres de Bordeaux · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Dynamics and Fractals
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgence Nationale de la RechercheCentre de Recherches Mathématiques
KeywordsMathematicsVariety (cybernetics)Projective varietyField (mathematics)Lebesgue measureMeasure (data warehouse)Pure mathematicsLebesgue integrationPoint (geometry)Series (stratigraphy)Regular polygonFunction (biology)Function fieldMathematical analysisGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By using the method of Arakelov geometry in the function field setting, we associate, to each graded linear series which is birational and of sub-finite type, a convex body whose Lebesgue measure identifies with the volume of the graded linear series. Compared to other constructions in the literature, less non-intrinsic parameters of the projective variety are involved in this new approach. Moreover, this method does not require the existence of a regular rational point in the projective variety, which was assumed for example in the construction of Lazarsfeld and Mustaţǎ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.278
Threshold uncertainty score0.750

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal de Théorie des Nombres de BordeauxSame topicMathematical Dynamics and FractalsFrench-language works237,207