Faktor-Faktor Fundamental Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Beta Saham (Studi Kasus Perusahaan Finance Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2013-2016)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini meneliti fenomena faktor-faktor fundamental yang berpengaruh terhadap beta saham pada perusahaan finance di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) dalam periode pengamatan 2013-2016. Tujuan penelitian adalah menguji dan menganalisis : 1) pengaruh Asset Growth terhadap beta saham, 2) pengaruh Total Asset Turnover terhadap beta saham, 3) pengaruh Firm Size terhadap beta saham, 4) pengaruh Operating Leverage terhadap beta saham, 5) pengaruh Financial Leverage terhadap beta saham, dan 6) faktor paling dominan terhadap beta saham; pada perusahaan finance di BEI periode 2013-2016. Penelitian ini berjenis kuantitatif, dengan mengambil pendekatan asosiatif kausal. Sampel diambil dengan metode purposive sampling , menghasilkan 28 perusahaan. Data diproses dengan uji asumsi klasik, dan hipotesis diuji dengan analisa regresi berganda. Temuan membuktikan bahwa Total Asset Turnover dan Firm Size berpengaruh positif terhadap Beta Saham, sedangkan Asset Growth, Degree of Operating Leverage (DOL), dan Debt to Equity Ratio (DER) tidak berpengaruh terhadap Beta Saham. Kata Kunci: beta saham, asset growth, total asset turnover, firm size, degree of operating leverage, debt to equity ratio.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it