MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2939262890 · doi:10.1520/jte20180567

Investigation of Normalization Method for SE(T) Specimen Based on Experimental and Numerical Studies

2019· article· en· W2939262890 on OpenAlexaff
Cheng Qian, Wenxing Zhou, Yifan Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Testing and Evaluation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFatigue and fracture mechanics
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNormalization (sociology)Finite element methodSingle specimenMaterials scienceStructural engineeringApplied mathematicsMathematicsEngineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The present study is focused on the application of the normalization method (NM) to develop the J-integral resistance (J-R) curve based on the clamped single-edge (notched) tension (SE(T)) specimen. The investigation involves experimental data obtained from six previously tested SE(T) specimens and 3-D finite element analyses that employ the Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman constitutive model and computational cell methodology. The results of the investigation indicate that the NM method is a viable alternative for developing the J-R curve using the SE(T) specimen. A so-called k factor is proposed to further improve the computational efficiency of the NM method for the SE(T) specimen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.434
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Testing and EvaluationSame topicFatigue and fracture mechanicsFrench-language works237,207