Thermodynamics‐based modelling of gas chromatography separations across column geometries and systems, including the prediction of peak widths
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thermodynamics-based models have been demonstrated to be useful for predicting retention time and peak widths in gas chromatography and two-dimensional gas chromatography separations. However, the collection of data to train the models can be time consuming, which lessens the practical utility of the method. In this contribution, a method for obtaining thermodynamic-based data to predict peak widths in temperature-programmed gas chromatography is presented. Experimental work to collect data for peak width prediction is identical to that required to collect data for retention time prediction using approaches that we have presented previously. Using this combined approach, chromatograms including retention times and peak widths are predicted with very high accuracy. Typical errors in retention time are < 0.5%, while errors in peak width are typically < 5% as demonstrated using polycycic aromatic hydrocarbons and a mixture containing compounds with aldehyde, ketone, alkene, alkane, alcohol, and ester functionalities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it