MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2939323212 · doi:10.32316/hse/rhe.v30i2.4641

Pamela Grundy, Color and Character: West Charlotte High and the American Struggle over Educational Equality

2018· article· en· W2939323212 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Ansley T. Erickson

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorical Studies in Education / Revue d histoire de l éducation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCritical Race Theory in Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCharacter (mathematics)PsychologyHistoryArtGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is an even-handed account of Mee which takes care to situate him in the milieu of his time and place.He was a eugenicist and an imperialist, who viewed the British Empire as a force for universal good, but he was also a practicing Christian and idealist who strove for a world where children would be offered equal opportunities and where poverty would be eradicated.Above all, he was a proud Englishman.But, all of this does not add up to sufficient reason for Crawford to devote time to writing a biography; or, for that matter, for others to read it.Mee warrants a biography because he was a cultural tour de force.He was a prolific writer and editor who produced popular publications intended for child readers that reflected the values and standards of the period and place.Contemporary Canadian readers may not be familiar with the man or the publications, but this biography provides fascinating insights into the ideals of middle-class Edwardian England through the writings of a man whose life epitomized those ideals and whose work had an impact on several generations of children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.564
Threshold uncertainty score0.877

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0200.008
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistorical Studies in Education / Revue d histoire de l éducationSame topicCritical Race Theory in EducationFrench-language works237,207