“Place in my hands the inexhaustible craft of medicine!” Physicians and healing at the royal court of Esarhaddon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Medicína starověké Mezopotámie je oblastí, jíž je věnována velká pozornost již od objevu „příruček“ pro osoby praktikující medicínu. Tyto lékařské texty ovšem obsahují spíše teoretické informace, zatímco dokladů o tom, jaká byla skutečná praxe, máme o poznání méně. Světlou výjimkou je novoasyrské období (zejména doba vlády krále Asarhaddona), ze kterého se dochovalo relativně velké množství textů, jež poskytují barvitější obraz jak konkrétních pacientů trpících různými chorobami, tak také metod léčby a osob, jež jí byly pověřeny. Tyto texty se však vztahují pouze k nejvyšším vrstvám asyrské společnosti, a tak je nelze v žádném případě chápat jako zdroj informací k medicínské praxi ve starověké Asýrii obecně.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".