Color characteristics of Beijing's regional woody vegetation based on Natural Color System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Seasonality is a typical characteristic of Beijing's regional vegetation, and plant color is one of the most prominent visual factors of vegetation dynamic. In this research, we explored the composition and dynamic characteristics of plant color in Beijing's urban vegetation, involving the analysis of overall characteristics and respective features of leaf, flower, and fruit colors. Color data was collected from 177 woody plant species in Beijing Botanical Garden, spanning their annual life cycle, and identified with the colorimetry of the Natural Color System (NCS). Correlation and regression analyses were applied to reveal the temporal dynamic features of overall plant color richness. Cluster analysis was applied to categorize tree species based on typical colors of various plant organs. Color richness and color dispersion were introduced as two factors to measure color diversity of various tree species, applied in species evaluation by sorting and principal component analysis (PCA). Color dispersion of three‐dimensional NCS data was measured with a modified SD based on the calculation of mean spatial distance in the NCS space. Main results are as follows. The first part is plant color composition. The composition of all plant colors contains 862 NCS color species, 20 blackness species ranging from 3 to 90, 20 chromaticness species ranging from 0 to 90, 35 hue species ranging from G10Y‐B90G, and N. The second part is temporal dynamic of overall color richness. Leaf color richness and total color richness are significantly positively correlated with pentad (5‐day) sequence; flower color richness is significantly negatively correlated with pentad sequence; and fruit color richness first increases and then decreases over time. The third part is cluster analysis of tree species. Based on typical growing‐leaf color, various tree species were clustered into 6 categories; based on typical senescent‐leaf color, various tree species were clustered into 6 categories; based on typical flower color, various tree species were clustered into 15 categories; based on typical fruit color, various tree species were clustered into 7 categories. The fourth part is color diversity evaluation of various tree species with PCA. According to the PCA of flower‐leaf color diversity, the species with higher leaf color diversity and higher flower color diversity include Cotinus coggygria, Lagerstroemia indica, and Amygdalus triloba; the species with higher flower color diversity and lower leaf color diversity include Campsis radicans and Tamarix chinensis; the species with higher leaf color diversity and lower flower color diversity include Acer ginnala and Crataegus pinnatifida; the species with lower color diversity both for flower and leaf colors include Fontanesia fortune and Gleditsia sinensis. According to the PCA of leaf color diversity, the species with higher leaf color diversity in both leaf growth period and leaf senescence period include Diospyros kaki, Lagerstroemia indica and Paeonia suffruticosa; the species with higher leaf color diversity in leaf growth period and lower leaf color diversity in leaf senescence period include Amygdalus persica ‘Atropurpurea’ and Prunus virginiana ‘Canada Red’; the species with higher leaf color diversity in leaf senescent period and lower color diversity in leaf growth period include Quercus palustris, Armeniaca sibirica, and Metasequoia glyptostroboides; the species with lower leaf color diversity for the whole leaf development period include Gleditsia sinensis and Swida walteri.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".