De la poétique à la politique autochtone : Agentivité des personnes humaines et autres-qu’humaines et performativité dans Bâtons à message / Tshissinuatshitakana de Joséphine Bacon et Bleuets et abricots de Natasha Kanapé Fontaine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article se propose d’étudier le rapport entre l’aspect performatif de la parole poétique autochtone et l’engagement politique de cette parole. Les recueils de poésie Bâtons à message / Tshissinuatshitakana (2009) de Joséphine Bacon et Bleuets et abricots (2016) de Natasha Kanapé Fontaine mettent tous les deux au premier plan l’agentivité des personnes humaines et autres-qu’humaines qui permet de renouveler constamment le contact avec les sagesses et les savoir-faire des ancêtres et de lutter ainsi pour la souveraineté innue tout en dénonçant la violence des pratiques coloniales. Cet article réfléchit en même temps au rôle du lecteur et du critique allochtone vis-à-vis des productions littéraires et artistiques autochtones, et à la manière dont il ou elle peut entrer en rapport avec ces œuvres de manière respectueuse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".