MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2939513970 · doi:10.5539/ijsp.v8n3p32

Continuous Time Markov Chain Model for Cholera Epidemic Transmission Dynamics

2019· article· en· W2939513970 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yohana Maiga Marwa, Isambi Sailon Mbalawata, Samuel Mwalili

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Statistics and Probability · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVibrio bacteria research studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCholeraMarkov chainContinuous-time Markov chainBasic reproduction numberOrdinary differential equationMathematicsMarkov modelMarkov processApplied mathematicsMarkov propertyStatisticsDifferential equationVirologyMathematical analysisBiologyMedicinePopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is concern with modeling cholera epidemic. Despite the advances made in understanding this disease and its treatment, cholera continues to be a major public health problem in many countries. Deterministic and stochastic models emerged in modeling of cholera epidemic, in order to understand the mechanism by which cholera disease spread, conditions for cholera disease to have minor and large outbreaks. We formulate a continuous time Markov chain model for cholera epidemic transmission from the deterministic model. The basic reproduction number (R0) and the extinction thresholds of corresponding cholera continuous time Markov chain model are derived under certain assumptions. We find that, the probability of extinction (no outbreak) is 1 if R0 < 1, but less than 1 if R0 > 1. We also carry out numerical simulations using Gillespie algorithm and Runge–Kutta method to generate the sample path of cholera continuous time Markov chain model and the solution of ordinary differential equation respectively. The results show that the sample path of continuous time Markov chain model fluctuates within the solution of the ordinary differential equation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Statistics and ProbabilitySame topicVibrio bacteria research studiesFrench-language works237,207