MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2939544604 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsz067.650

0652 Interim Analysis from the REM Sleep Behavior Disorder Associations with Parkinson’s Disease Study (RAPiDS)

2019· article· en· W2939544604 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daniel A. Barone, Lisa Ravdin, Mary L. Vo, Gabrielle Auerbach, Miles Q. DeGrazia, Natalie Hellmers, Fei Wang, Dianne M. Augelli, Sarah Reynolds, Kerry Mcmanus, Matthew R. Ebben, Ana C. Krieger, Claire Henchcliffe

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsREM sleep behavior disorderParkinson's diseaseSleep (system call)DiseaseRapid eye movement sleepMedicineInterimPsychologyPsychiatryClinical psychologyInternal medicineElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is a significant risk factor for alpha-synucleinopathies, including Parkinson’s disease (PD); however, there exists no means of predicting prognosis, and a paucity of data regarding further workup. We present an interim cross-sectional analysis of the longitudinal REM Behavior Disorder Associations with Parkinson’s Disease Study (RAPiDS) database and biorepository, which is a protocol to enroll and track 100 patients with RBD and REM sleep without atonia (RSWA). Participants with RBD or RSWA were prospectively recruited from the Weill Cornell Center for Sleep Medicine. Those with a diagnosed neurodegenerative disorder were excluded. Evaluations comprised polysomnography, medical history, and standardized rating scales and examination focused on neurologic, psychiatric, and autonomic function, including a validated test for hyposmia/dysosmia, the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT), that is associated with, but not specific for, pre-motor PD. We evaluated 30 participants with RBD and 3 with RSWA, with mean 2.36±2.0 years since diagnosis. Mean age was 58.2±16.4 years, and 9/33 were women; 36% reported a history of psychiatric illness; 24% were currently taking, and 27% reported ever taking antidepressant medication. Urinary dysfunction was present in 23%, constipation in 23%, and 12/31 (39%) had abnormal Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores. Additionally, UPSIT scores were significantly associated with presence of constipation and urinary dysfunction in these subjects, as well as with slowed gait, impaired balance, and tremor. Despite excluding patients with neurodegenerative disorders, we detected an unexpectedly high incidence of additional symptoms and signs, prompting the proposed term “RBD-plus”. Our RAPiDS cohort is a step in determining what clinical factors should be evaluated further in RBD patients; screening for potential early indicators of alpha-synucleinopathy would not only improve care for RBD patients, but could eventually facilitate inclusion in trials focused on disease prevention or in slowing progression. While it is too early to detect what exactly is implicated in the conversion to alpha-synucleinopathy, our cohort will allow for improved understanding and characterization of which patients are at risk. Private grant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207