MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2939640336 · doi:10.3233/jad-181203

Plasma Sphingolipids Mediate a Relationship Between Type 2 Diabetes and Memory Outcomes in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Undertaking Exercise

2019· article· en· W2939640336 on OpenAlexafffund
Kelsey A. Eakin, Mahwesh Saleem, Nathan Herrmann, Hugo Cogo‐Moreira, Michelle M. Mielke, Paul Oh, Norman J. Haughey, Swarajya Lakshmi Vattem Venkata, Krista L. Lanctôt, Walter Swardfager

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Alzheimer s Disease · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
Canadian institutionsToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity Health NetworkQueen's University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsLactosylceramideConfidence intervalMemory improvementCoronary artery diseaseVerbal memoryCalifornia Verbal Learning TestType 2 diabetesSphingolipidBody mass indexInternal medicineCeramideMedicineCardiologyCognitionDiabetes mellitusEndocrinologyPsychiatryBiologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Exercise prevents recurrent cardiovascular events and it may combat cognitive decline in coronary artery disease (CAD); however, evidence in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) has been mixed. T2DM and memory decline have been associated with differences in the plasma sphingolipidome. OBJECTIVE: Here, we will investigate whether T2DM-related sphingolipids predict less memory improvement over an exercise intervention for CAD. METHODS: Among participants with CAD entering a 6-month exercise intervention, we matched 20 with T2DM to 40 without T2DM for age, sex, and body mass index. We assessed 45 sphingolipid species using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry with multiple reaction monitoring. We assessed memory using the California Verbal Learning Test, 2nd Ed, and the revised Brief Visuospatial Learning Test. RESULTS: Partial least squares discriminant analysis identified 8 species that distinguished T2DM from non-T2DM groups with 83% (95% confidence interval [70%, 95%]) accuracy in a receiver operator characteristic curve (validated by internal resampling, 1000 permutations, p = 0.01). At baseline, T2DM-associated sphingolipids (ceramide C22 : 0, monohexylceramide C16 : 1, and lactosylceramide C24 : 0) were associated with poorer memory, attention, and psychomotor processing speed performance. Among 50 completers, an indirect effect of T2DM on less improvement in verbal memory was mediated by monohexylceramide C16 : 1 (0.86 fewer words recalled, 95% bootstrap confidence interval [-2.32, -0.24]), and an indirect effect of T2DM on less visuospatial memory improvement was mediated by ceramide C22 : 0 concentrations (0.42 fewer points, 95% bootstrap confidence interval [-1.17, -0.05]). CONCLUSIONS: Ceramide species associated with T2DM predicted poorer cognitive responses to exercise in patients with CAD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Alzheimer s DiseaseSame topicSphingolipid Metabolism and SignalingFrench-language works237,207