Inflammasome gene expression is associated with immunopathology in human localized cutaneous leishmaniasis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Localized cutaneous leishmaniasis (LCL) can ultimately progress to chronic ulcerated lesions with strong local inflammatory reactions. The functional role of certain inflammasomes in mediating inflammation caused by Leishmania braziliensis needs to be addressed. By combining PCR-array, quantitative real-time PCR and immunohistochemical analysis, we identified inflammasome genes, such as IL-1β, NLRP3, NLRP1, NLRC5, AIM2 and P2RX7, that were upregulated in LCL patients. Temporal gene expression studies showed that the early phase of LCL displayed increased NLRP3 and reduced AIM2 and NLRP1 expression, while the late stages showed increased AIM2 and NLRP1 and lower NLRP3 expression. Our findings also showed that AIM2, NLRP1, and P2RX7 promoted susceptibility to experimental L. braziliensis infection. These results highlight the importance of inflammasome machinery in human LCL and suggest that inflammasome machinery plays a role in the acute and chronic phases of the disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".