MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2939733642 · doi:10.1130/g46008.1

Shock-produced high-pressure (La, Ce, Th)PO4 polymorph revealed by microstructural phase heritage of monazite

2019· article· en· W2939733642 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Timmons M. Erickson, Nicholas E. Timms, Mark A. Pearce, Cyril Cayron, A. Deutsch, L. P. Keller, D. A. Kring

Bibliographic record

VenueGeology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonaziteLibrary scienceHistoryArt historyArchaeologyGeologyGeochemistryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The responses of uranium-bearing accessory minerals to shock metamorphism have received growing interest, because under extreme pressure and temperature conditions, these phases can form unique microstructures and/or polymorphs and their radiometric ages can be partially to wholly reset. This study presents new, high-resolution electron backscatter diffraction microstructural analyses of shock-deformed monazite, (La, Ce, Th)PO4, from the Haughton Dome, Nunavut, Canada, and the Nordlinger-Ries Crater, southern Germany. At each locality, shocked monazite grains contain distinctive lamellae comprising interlocking laths in four systematic crystallographic orientations. Modelling of orientation relationships among these lath-textured microstructures reveals that they were produced by reversion from lamellae of a previously undescribed high-pressure polymorph with a tetragonal symmetry. This is the first report of polymorphism found in natural (La, Ce, Th)PO4. The orientation relationships, lamellar forms, and ready reversion to monazite at low pressures are consistent with a deviatoric transformation. The former presence of this new (La, Ce, Th)PO4 polymorph is detected in moderately to highly shocked rocks, suggesting that it may be common at other impact craters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.707
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeologySame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207