MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2939750159 · doi:10.1109/vtcfall.2018.8690755

Efficient Group-Sparse Transceiver Design for Multiuser MIMO Relaying in C-RAN

2018· article· en· W2939750159 on OpenAlexaff
Ayoub Saab, Jiaxin Yang, Benoı̂t Champagne, Ioannis Psaromiligkos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTransceiverMIMORelayRadio access networkIterative methodEfficient energy usePrecodingDecoding methodsC-RANWirelessComputational complexity theoryTransmitter power outputMathematical optimizationElectronic engineeringAlgorithmBase stationPower (physics)Computer networkBeamformingTelecommunicationsTransmitterMathematicsEngineeringMobile stationElectrical engineeringChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the design of multiuser MIMO amplify-and-forward relaying within a cloud radio access network (C-RAN) from an energy-efficiency perspective. The aim is to jointly select remote radio heads and optimize their transceiver in order to assist the communication between multiple source-destination pairs. We formulate the design problem as an interference leakage minimization subject to per-relay power constraints along with linear signal preserving constraints at the destinations. To obtain an energy efficient relaying solution, the objective function is penalized with a regularization term which promotes group-sparsity among the resultant relaying weights. A low-complexity iterative algorithm based on the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) is then proposed to solve the regularized problem. Simulation results demonstrate the explicit benefits of the proposed algorithm, which results in notably lower power consumption and computational complexity than conventional relaying design methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.795
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207