Unveiling Corrosion Behavior of Pipeline Steels in CO<sub>2</sub>-Containing Oilfield Produced Water: Towards Combating the Corrosion Curse
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The presence of carbon dioxide (CO2) in oilfield produced water, which could be natural or intentionally injected component in oil and gas production, is extremely corrosive to pipelines and tubings. Oilfield produced water is mainly brine solution comprising organic acids, purely condensed water as well as aggressive ions like SO42−, Cl− and dissolved acid gases (like CO2). CO2 induced corrosion in this media is more detrimental than corrosion induced by HCl. This study critically unveiled the CO2 corrosion behavior of steel in oilfield produced water. The subjects covered include the chemistry of CO2 in water, supercritical CO2 condition, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and corrosion control. Corrosion resistant alloy has been proved to exhibit remarkable corrosion resistance due to formation of strong protective film that can prevent localized corrosion. Moreover, the use of viable surface-active compounds, which are constituents of crude oil is a promising strategy for pipeline steel corrosion mitigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".