DR4-Ser424<i>O</i>-GlcNAcylation Promotes Sensitization of TRAIL-Tolerant Persisters and TRAIL-Resistant Cancer Cells to Death
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) resistance, including nongenetically acquired tolerance in cancer persister cells, is a major obstacle to translating TRAIL therapy into patients with cancer. However, the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. Here, we show that DR4/TRAIL-R1 is O-GlcNAcylated at Ser424 in its death domain to mediate both apoptosis and necrosis upon TRAIL ligation. We found that DR4–Ser424 mutations, identified from our cell-based functional screen using a cancer patient–derived cDNA expression library and from The Cancer Genome Atlas, caused TRAIL resistance in various human cancer cell lines. Using O-GlcNAc transferase knockdown cells, DR4-preferred versus DR5-preferred cancer cells, and a DR5-neutralizing antibody, we evaluated the essential role of DR4-specific O-GlcNAc modification in TRAIL cytotoxicity. In contrast to DR4, DR5 was not O-GlcNAcylated by TRAIL treatment, discriminating DR4 from DR5-mediated signaling. Apart from genetic changes in DR4-Ser424, we further classified various cancer cell lines originated from stomach, colon, lung, and glioblastoma according to their sensitivity to and receptor preference upon TRAIL death signaling and generated TRAIL-tolerant persister-derived DLD-1PER cells. Among these, we discovered that DR4 was not modified by O-GlcNAc in most of the TRAIL-resistant cancer cells and DLD-1PER cells. Interestingly, promoting DR4 O-GlcNAcylation intentionally using 2-deoxy-d-glucose or a high concentration of glucose sensitized those resistant cancer cells to TRAIL. The O-GlcNAcylation–defective DR4 failed to form DISC/necrosome and could not translocate to aggregated platforms for receptor clustering. Our findings demonstrate that DR4 O-GlcNAcylation is crucial for TRAIL death signaling, providing new opportunities for TRAIL therapy overcoming TRAIL resistance in cancers. Significance: This study reports that a novel posttranslational modification by O-GlcNAcylation of one of the two human TRAIL receptors with a death domain, TRAIL-R1 (DR4), plays a crucial role in enabling both apoptotic and necroptotic cell death induction by TRAIL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".