News Soybean Sowing Arrangements on Spray and Control of Asian Rust
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Asian soybean rust (ASR) is one of the most severe diseases of the soybean crop, and the use of fungicides is the main form of control. Among the updates of soybean production system is adoption of new sowing arrangements. However are still incipient the studies to combine soybean sowing arrangements and pesticide spraying techniques on phytosanitary treatments on this crop. Therefore, the study aimed to evaluate the impact of different soybean sowing arrangements on spraying, ASR control, agronomic parameters and yield. The experimental design was randomized blocks in the subdivided plots scheme, with five sowing arrangements and two application techniques (with and without adjuvant). The spray deposition and coverage levels, the vertical distribution of leaves in the plants on different sowing arrangements, were evaluated the ASR disease severity and the productivity. Spraying is not affected by sowing arrangements. The adjuvant increased spray coverage. The vertical distribution of the leaves and number of branches in the soybean plants is affected by the sowing arrangement. The disease severity and yield were not affected by sowing arrangements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".