Impacto da Residência de Medicina da Família e Comunidade no Atendimento a Mulheres Vítimas de Violência
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The residency programs should guarantee means of learning and applicability within the scope of the SUS and promote improvements in comprehensive care, especially for women victims of violence. Objective: to evaluate the quality of AB services in relation to violence against women in the municipality of Gurupi-TO. A cross-sectional survey was carried out from December 2017 to February 2018 in 12 UBS of the urban network. The health professionals answered the QualiAB questionnaire, and the questions dealing with the evaluation of violence against women were extracted. The data of the UBS with the program were compared with those without, by means of the chi-square test, in the program EPI INFO 3.2.2. 107 professionals answered the questionnaire. In the question "Diagnosis and monitoring of situations of domestic and sexual violence", there was no difference between the groups, but the indicators "strategies used by the unit for detection" and "procedures performed in case of detection of violence against women" are better in the units with program. It is concluded that this research showed that the residence program as a SUS policy contributes to improve the quality of the service to attend violence against women in an effective and resolutive way to SUS users.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it