PENGARUH INTERMEDIASI PERBANKAN TERHADAP PERTUMBUHAN EKONOMI INDONESIA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to discuss banking as a financial intermediary institution in increasing economic growth. The banking intermediation variable in this study is measured by two variables, namely the ratio of credits per Real GDP and the ratio of third party funds to Real GDP. In addition to financial variables, also used control variables to economic growth is BI-rates. The data used are 1 st quarter 2007 to 4 th quarter 2014. This study uses a cointegration test of the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach to prove the long-term effects between variables and error correction models (ECM) to see how quickly the economy returns to a balanced state when there is a short-term shock. The result shows that there is a long-term relationship between variables, where the ratio of credits per Real GDP, third party funds to Real GDP, and BI- rates have a positive and significant impact on Indonesia's economic growth, both in the long term and short term
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it