MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2940102974 · doi:10.5539/jas.v11n5p131

Influence of Air Temperature in the Emission of Nodes, Ramifications and Flowers in Hybrids of Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus)

2019· article· en· W2940102974 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Denise Schmidt, Francisco Ernesto Dalla Nora, Daniele Cristina Fontana, Gizelli Moiano de Paula, Leonardo Antônio Thiesen, Braulio Otomar Caron

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvances in Cucurbitaceae Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul
KeywordsStamenHybridCitrullus lanatusBotanyHorticulturePlant reproductive morphologyBiologyMain stemPollen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The culture of watermelon develops mainly under conditions of high temperature, being the temperature an element that directly affects the emission of vegetative and reproductive organs. There are no reports of the accumulation of temperature required for emission of branches, nodes and flowers. Thus, this experiment aimed to evaluate the rate of emission of vegetative and reproductive organs for hybrids of watermelon in relation to air temperature, using the hybrids of Manchester and Top Gun watermelons. The experiment was conducted in Federal University of Santa Maria, campus Frederico Westphalen-RS, from September to December 2014. Evaluations were conducted at every two days and it was determined the variables: nodes emission, final number of nodes on the main stem, number of primary and secondary ramifications and number of staminate flowers and open pistillate flowers related to accumulated thermal sum for the emission of such organs, and the ratio between the number of staminate flowers to the pistillate. The hybrids of watermelon present for plastochron of 18.8 °C node day, final number of nodes of the main ramification of 43 and number of primary and secondary ramifications of eight and 20, respectively. For the emission of staminate and pistillate flowers the hybrids need an accumulation 10.5 and 46.7 °C day, respectively. The number of staminate and pistillate flowers is 52 and nine, respectively, and the ration between flowers of 6.6:1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicAdvances in Cucurbitaceae ResearchFrench-language works237,207