Trauma recovery through the writing of the collective fictional self in Obasan, by Joy Kogawa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente artigo pretende verificar de que maneira o romance Obasan (1981), da autora nipo-canadense Joy Kogawa, busca reconciliar a nacao canadense com um evento traumatico de seu passado recente. O romance aborda a opressao exercida pelo governo canadense contra parte dos proprios cidadaos do pais durante a Segunda Guerra Mundial. Neste periodo, todos os residentes de origem niponica do Canada tiveram suas propriedades confiscadas, alem de serem removidos de suas residencias e alojados em campos de internamento e trabalho forcado. Obasan foi o primeiro relato literario deste periodo historico, e adquiriu representativa importância politica atraves de sua narrativa, que combina elementos autobiograficos (com enfase no coletivo, em lugar do individual), ficcionais e historicos. Para o estudo da obra serao abordadas as teorias de autores tais como Susan Friedman, Leigh Gilmore, bell hooks, Dominick LaCapra, Sidonie Smith & Julia Watson e Hayden White, entre outros.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".