MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2940212090 · doi:10.4000/ces.4998

A Note on Utrecht Allegory

2015· article· en· W2940212090 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueCommonwealth Essays and Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShort Stories in Global Literature
Canadian institutionsECW Press (Canada)University of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAllegoryAllusionMetaphorAdventureCovertPortraitArtLiteratureArt historyHistoryPhilosophyTheologyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alice Munro’s “The Peace of Utrecht” first appeared in Tamarack Review in 1960,1 eight years before it was collected as the penultimate story in Dance of the Happy Shades. Often cited as one of the strongest stories in this first collection, the story is generally read as a feminist study of sisterhood and a covert portrait of Munro’s mother.2 Few critics fasten for long on the implications of the title.3 This note comments briefly on ways in which the titular allusion to the Peace of Utrecht constitutes a substantial and even allegorical function in the story rather than functioning simply as a metaphor for the sisters’ momentary entente.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.515

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommonwealth Essays and StudiesSame topicShort Stories in Global LiteratureFrench-language works237,207