A Rational Design of Cu<sub>2</sub>O−SnO<sub>2</sub> Core‐Shell Catalyst for Highly Selective CO<sub>2</sub>‐to‐CO Conversion
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The electrochemical reduction of CO 2 (CO 2 RR) is a versatile method that is capable of simultaneously reduce CO 2 emission and produce valuable fuels and chemicals. However, its application is hindered by the lack of cost‐effective catalysts and significant overpotential requirement. In this work, we report a low‐cost and surfactant/capping agent free method to synthesize cubic Cu 2 O−SnO 2 core‐shell electrocatalyst, whose thickness can be easily controlled by the content of tin precursor. The optimized Cu 2 O−SnO 2 catalyst with a 5 nm‐thick shell achieved over 90 % faradaic efficiency towards CO at a low overpotential of 390 mV, which is comparable to some of the noble metal catalysts. The catalyst also exhibited good stability over 18 hours of test at −0.6 V vs. RHE in 0.5 M KHCO 3 electrolyte . This work provides a widely applicable strategy for developing a low‐cost electrocatalyst for CO 2 conversion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it