Répondre aux besoins de santé des jeunes de la rue
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les dispensateurs de soins qui voient des jeunes sans-abri ou des jeunes de la rue peuvent contribuer à réduire les conséquences de nombreux facteurs de risque d’ordre physique, mental, affectif et social, liés à la culture de la rue. Le présent document de principes présente les divers types et l’ampleur de l’itinérance au Canada et traite des raisons pour lesquelles les jeunes se tournent vers la rue, des risques de « l’économie de la rue » et des obstacles aux soins de santé. On y aborde les problèmes de santé physique et mentale courants, de même que les enjeux juridiques et éthiques susceptibles d’influer sur les soins. Les principes des soins, y compris l’accessibilité, la confidentialité et la réduction des préjudices, et les stratégies en vue de cibler et de faire participer cette population, ont suscité des recommandations en vue d’améliorer les services, les issues, la défense d’intérêts et le soutien gouvernemental accru.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".