MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2940336610 · doi:10.33087/daurling.v2i1.18

Variasi Ketebalan Arang Cangkang Biji Karet dengan Metode Filtrasi Downflow Dalam Penurunan Parameter Fe Air Tanah Dalam

2019· article· en· W2940336610 on OpenAlexaff
Andri Rhomadon Ritonga, Marhadi Marhadi

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Daur Lingkungan · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy Metal Pollution Remediation
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerationFiltration (mathematics)Activated charcoalCharcoalEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringGroundwaterSurface waterNatural rubberRaw waterWater treatmentPulp and paper industryChemistryAdsorptionGeotechnical engineeringGeologyEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Water resources generally cover surface and ground water. Surface water will be more easily polluted than ground water, because surface water is more easily contaminated with sources of pollution so that people use water sourced from deep ground water. In Jambi city particular the Kenali Asam Atas area, is included in a residential area with a moderate density of approximately ± 6,903 Ha. PDAM service area coverage is still 2%, from the service area coverage of 10965 SR. The purpose of this study was to reduce Fe and pH parameters in deep groundwater using downflow and aeration filtration methods on variations in thickness of rubber seed shell charcoal by filtration method and variation of processing time in the aeration process using bubble aerator. The results of the downflow filtration method using variations in the thickness of 15 cm and 30 cm rubber seed shell charcoal for Fe parameters of 0.302 mg / l and pH of 5.08, while in the aeration treatment process using a variation of processing time of 30 minutes and 60 minutes for Fe parameters amounting to 0.354 mg / l and pH of 5.23.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Daur LingkunganSame topicHeavy Metal Pollution RemediationFrench-language works237,207