MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2940368062 · doi:10.1080/01431161.2019.1602792

Unsupervised change detection of VHR remote sensing images based on multi-resolution Markov Random Field in wavelet domain

2019· article· en· W2940368062 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Remote Sensing · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsWaveletChange detectionMarkov random fieldArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceWavelet transformScale (ratio)Robustness (evolution)Feature (linguistics)Remote sensingComputer visionImage (mathematics)GeographyImage segmentation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes an unsupervised change detection method for very-high-resolution (VHR) remote sensing images based on multi-resolution Markov random field (MRF) model in wavelet domain. Firstly, the wavelet transform is performed on the difference image achieved by the change vector analysis (CVA) method, and the wavelet coefficients at each scale are obtained. Then, MRF model is constructed based on the wavelet coefficients. The wavelet high-frequency coefficients establish a feature field model that describes the feature attributes of each pixel location at each scale. The initial change map (changed and unchanged) at the coarse scale are generated through applying the k-means method to the wavelet low-frequency coefficients, and a label field model describing the region of the variation results is established. The label and feature field, at the same scale, got the optimized change map under the Bayesian criterion. Finally, the results of the low-resolution scale change map are directly projected as the adjacent higher-scale initial change map. The more accurate change map is obtained successively from the coarse scale to the original resolution scale, and the detection result of the original resolution is obtained at last. Experiments on Quick Bird, SPOT-5, and IKONOS optical images have demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed method. The experimental results show that the method has better regional consistency and strong robustness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it