Analysis of the Barriers in the Educational Communication With Adolescent Students
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: the educational communicative with adolescent’s students has turned into a problem social educationally in resolute Cuba from the present day. Objective: to analyze the barriers in the educational communication with adolescent students. Methods: the investigation covered a period from May 2018 to December 2018. A descriptive transactional design was used with a descriptive study under a sample of 35 eleventh grade students from the IPU “Mariano Clemente Prado” of the city of Santa Clara, Cuba. Results: it was obtained that dissent exists in the students because the professors stimulate its participation in the educational aspects, and they worry about the instructive area; difficulties are verified in the professors with relationship to the styles talkative employees with the adolescents. Conclusions: the difficulties in the educational communication toward the students are related with the communication styles assumed by the educational aspect that should be improved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it