MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2940420311 · doi:10.11575/prism/36319

Provenance and Tectonic Implications of LA-ICP-MS Zircon Depth-Profiling, Nanaimo Basin, British Columbia, Canada

2019· dissertation· en· W2940420311 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marie‐Pier Boivin

Bibliographic record

VenuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZirconProvenanceGeologyStructural basinArchaeologyTectonicsProfiling (computer programming)GeochemistrySeismologyPaleontologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Detrital zircon studies from sedimentary rocks of the Nanaimo Basin provide an important independent test of the Late Cretaceous paleogeographic position for the basin, and the associated Insular Superterrane, Coast Plutonic Complex (CPC), and North Cascades of the North American Cordillera. Detrital zircon populations not derived from the CPC provide the best constraints on paleolatitudes for the Nanaimo Basin in the Late Cretaceous. Non-CPC sources for the basin are restricted to the Lemhi sub-basin (Idaho and Montana), or the Mojave-Sonoran Region (MSR) of the southwestern US and northern Mexico. We distinguish between these potential non-CPC sediment source areas by combining sandstone petrographic observations with detrital zircon depth-profiling of thin zircon rims observed on >30% of zircons from Maastrichtian Nanaimo Group rocks. These data allow us to interpret tectono-metamorphic events that led to rim development in the sediment source region of the Nanaimo Basin, and provide additional provenance constraints for the non-CPC source region. Our results show that zircon rims are ubiquitous on Proterozoic grains but are also present on Mesozoic populations. Rim growth indicates metamorphism and magmatism in the non-CPC source area from ~100 – 69 Ma and 110 – 64 Ma, respectively. Core ages (modes ~1698 Ma and ~1388 Ma) are similar for grains with metamorphic or magmatic rims, suggesting they both derive from a single source region that underwent metamorphism and partial melting in the Late Cretaceous. The timing of rim growth closely matches the timing of tectono-metamorphic events in the MSR, and our data suggest that metasedimentary rocks are the source of non-CPC grains in the Nanaimo Basin. Our interpretation of a metasedimentary source differs from previous claims that Nanaimo Basin sediments derived from crystalline basement rocks and recycled sedimentary successions in the MSR. We interpret that drainages never connected the Nanaimo Basin directly to rocks of the MSR and propose instead that metasedimentary rocks were the source of non-CPC grains in the basin. The arrival of non-CPC detritus in the basin ~72 Ma is interpreted to represent the onset of northward translation of the Baja-BC block from paleolatitudes near modern-day southwestern California to its present position.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.158
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRISM (University of Calgary)Same topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207